Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:11
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Nearly complete dinosaur skull reveals a new sauropod species from East Asia - Phys.org
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are people becoming increasingly hostile to pro-lifers? I am pro-life.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
When did you realize that your childhood was not normal?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
What is the difference between the terms "Millennials" and "kids"?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
When Kundalini is awakened accidentally, what can be done?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Android 16's new beta makes changing call settings easier - Android Police
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here’s a guide to the latest. - The Boston Globe